The lifetime ban on blood donations by men who have sex with men is expected to be lifted in the UK.The restrictions were put in place in the 1980s to prevent the risk of HIV contamination.However, the latest medical evidence presented to a government panel argued that such a ban could no longer be justified.Several countries have relaxed the rules, basing them on the time since the last homosexual encounter.The National Blood Service screens all donations for HIV and other infections. However, there is a "window period" after infection during which it is impossible to detect the virus.In the UK, a lifetime ban was introduced in the early 1980s as a response to the Aids epidemic and the lack of adequate HIV tests.Most new HIV infections acquired in the UK are from men who have sex with men.Other at-risk groups, such as people who have been sexually active in high-risk countries, are banned from donating for a year.The lifetime ban has been questioned both on equality and medical grounds, in the light of developments such as improved blood screening tests which have reduced the size of the "window period" and reduced the risk of contamination.South Africa has introduced a six-month gap between sex and donation. It is a year in Australia, Sweden and Japan.Research published at the end of last year suggested there was no significant increase in the risk of HIV infection after the change in the rules in Australia.The UK government's Advisory Committee on the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs has been reviewing policy.During its meeting in January it was argued that "the evidence does not support the continuation of the ban", and "the evidence supports a 12-month deferral period since last occurrence be introduced for men who have had oral or anal sex with another man, whether a condom or other protective was used or not".Earlier in the year the Royal College of Nursing voted overwhelmingly in favour of lifting the ban.The Terrence Higgins Trust, the UK's largest HIV and sexual health charity, says the arguments must be about public health, not discrimination.It states: "We believe any decision on the safety of the blood supply must be based on evidence and not on political lobbying or framing of it as purely an equalities issue." From/ BBC
GMT 18:35 2018 Thursday ,11 January
Syrian refugee sets himself ablaze at UN office in LebanonGMT 18:48 2018 Tuesday ,09 January
Novo Nordisk woos Belgian nano-drug makerGMT 17:54 2017 Wednesday ,27 December
Medical evacuations begin from besieged Syria rebel bastionGMT 12:14 2017 Monday ,25 December
MoHAP successfully conducts cochlear implant operationGMT 18:24 2017 Sunday ,24 December
Palestinian conjoined twins arrive in RiyadhGMT 19:05 2017 Monday ,18 December
new! magazine names fitness & food editorGMT 17:03 2017 Wednesday ,29 November
Spain reports case of 'mad cow disease'GMT 14:05 2017 Saturday ,11 November
EU can't agree on new licence for controversial glyphosate weedkillerMaintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2021 ©
Maintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2021 ©
Send your comments
Your comment as a visitor